You are currently browsing the tag archive for the 'speaking' tag.

I’m pleased to report that the email and print promotions have gone out for the CASE conference I’m chairing in April:  Social Media & Community: Developing and Managing Strategies for Online Outreach. Perhaps that’s how you found your way to my blog. Welcome!

A quick reminder: we’ve set up presences on third-party sites where you can interact with faculty and with each other before, during, and after the conference. Of note:

Twitter: follow @CASEsmc, and use the hashtag #CASEsmc10 to keep up with news and info. If you’re planning to join us in Chicago in April, @reply the CASEsmc Twitter account. We’ll follow you and add you to this Twitter list: http://twitter.com/casesmc/attendees.

Diigo (social bookmarks): find articles, blog posts and other content of note in the conference Diigo group. We’ll keep this active after the conference as well.

Flickr: post some photos you’re proud of, and post your photos from Chicago after the conference in our Flickr group. If you’re unfamiliar with Flickr, this is a good chance to try it out.

See you in April!

Is it “twenty ten” or “ten” or “one-oh”? Regardless of what we all decide, I’m looking forward to the new year.

I have some speaking engagements lined up, not least of which is the CASE Social Media and Community conference in Chicago in April. I’m honored to be serving as chair of the conference, and to be speaking with such amazing faculty: Leisha LeCouvie of McGill University, Joel Price of Friends’ Central School, and Michael Stoner of mStoner.

All of the details, including the program, our keynote speaker and more will be added to the CASE website in the coming weeks. But in the meantime, check out the Faculty Twitter list and follow the conference on Twitter (@casesmc). We’ll tweet insider info, updates, articles, notes and other details of interest to attendees. I hope to see you in April!

This is my last blog post for 2009; enjoy the holidays and happy new year.

The backchannel.

If you’re unfamiliar with the term, it’s a way of communicating digitally in real time during the delivery of live, spoken remarks. In modern parlance, the backchannel is the audience using Twitter and hashtags to converse about a particular presenter while the person (or persons) is speaking.

This practice isn’t new; Twitter just facilitates it. But it became big news a few weeks ago at the Higher Ed Web conference. The keynote speaker did not know his audience, was not well received, and the audience made their opinions known via Twitter. The backchannel was blazing with comments ranging from the quality of the slides to the relevance of the material covered to the general ineptitude of the speaker.

All of this was fresh in my mind as I made my way to Missouri to deliver a talk. I had read Jeremiah Owyang’s post on this issue, and I put some thought into how I might acknowledge the online conversation without short-changing the people who came to interact with me face-to-face. Jeremiah suggests monitoring the backchannel during your talk, dividing your focus between the feedback in the room and the feedback from the Twitterverse. I was afraid of short changing both audiences by trying to be in two places at once.

So I made a decision: give “first dibs” on my attention to the people who were sitting in the room. I reminded the audience of the hashtag for the conference (#musms09) and specifically acknowledged the backchannel conversation that I knew was inevitable. But I made it clear that I was there to interact with the audience directly at that point in time; I would go back and refer to the backchannel when the talk had ended.

In this particular case, I feel that my approach was effective. I didn’t have to divide my attention between reading the physical audience and the pixelated audience. If I had it to do again, I would probably assign a colleague or trusted audience member to monitor the backchannel on my behalf during my presentation (Jeremiah suggests this in his post above). Then, at the end of the talk, I would address “questions from the backchannel” brought to my attention by my colleague. Michael Stoner stepped into this role during my talk in Missouri even though we had not arranged it ahead of time (thank you Michael!).

I’d like to hear your thoughts and suggestions on engaging the backchannel; you may have experience as a speaker or an audience member – post a comment below with your experience or insight.

On Thursday, October 15, I’ll be in Columbia, Missouri for the University of Missouri’s Social Media Summit ‘09. Brad J. Ward of Blue Fuego and I will be on hand to talk about social media in higher ed and beyond. [Update: Follow the conversation on Twitter with the conference hashtag: #musms09]

The following week, I’ll be in Irvine, California at the CARA (California Advancement Researchers Association) Annual Statewide Conference from October 22-23. I’m taking part in a panel discussing social media in fundraising and prospect research. Members of the panel are Jay Frost of Frost on Fundraising, Alison Becker, Senior Research Analyst at  UCLA, and Vladimir Foronda, Prospect Researcher at Earthjustice.

[10/16 Update: slides are now available from the Social Media Summit at Mizzou. Find them here.]

[10/19 Update: the conversations at the Social Media Summit at Mizzou sparked some thoughtful and insightful blog posts.

  • Andrew Careaga's post at higher ed marketing with a conference recap and afterthoughts
  • Christine Hollingsworth pointed me to a post at the  Missouri FCCLA blog on social media opportunity cost, inspired by the conference
  • Michael Stoner's post at mStonerblog with musings from the conference and thoughts on "engagement fatigue"

Thanks to all for the great conversation, thoughts, and insight.]