Alumni Networks and Twitter: A White Paper

I’ve co-authored a white paper with Andy Shaindlin of Alumni Futures: Alumni Networks and Twitter: An Update. This white paper represents a fresh look at content we produced a year ago analyzing alumni networks and Twitter. When we wrote the first paper in January 2009, Twitter was very new and hadn’t gained much penetration in higher ed (or elsewhere). As you are likely aware, Twitter grew exponentially in the past 12 months and underwent some changes – this new, updated white paper reflects on those changes and poses some questions for the future.

The white paper also compares data from a survey we conducted back in 2009 with one we conducted last month,  which takes a look at the ways in which alumni associations have implemented Twitter, including lists, a recently introduced feature.

Download Alumni Networks and Twitter: An Update (705kb PDF) >>

Tweet about the White Paper and share this info with your followers >>

Please leave your comments here, or post them to Andy’s blog. We hope you find it useful!

Conference Buzz: CASE SMC

I’m pleased to report that the email and print promotions have gone out for the CASE conference I’m chairing in April:  Social Media & Community: Developing and Managing Strategies for Online Outreach. Perhaps that’s how you found your way to my blog. Welcome!

A quick reminder: we’ve set up presences on third-party sites where you can interact with faculty and with each other before, during, and after the conference. Of note:

Twitter: follow @CASEsmc, and use the hashtag #CASEsmc10 to keep up with news and info. If you’re planning to join us in Chicago in April, @reply the CASEsmc Twitter account. We’ll follow you and add you to this Twitter list: http://twitter.com/casesmc/attendees.

Diigo (social bookmarks): find articles, blog posts and other content of note in the conference Diigo group. We’ll keep this active after the conference as well.

Flickr: post some photos you’re proud of, and post your photos from Chicago after the conference in our Flickr group. If you’re unfamiliar with Flickr, this is a good chance to try it out.

See you in April!

A Twitter Survey: Your Input Needed

It’s been one year since Andrew Shaindlin of Alumni Futures and I published a white paper on Twitter and Alumni Relations. What’s changed? You tell us.

Last year, we conducted a survey to find out more about those in the world of education, alumni relations and advancement: who is using Twitter, how often, and for what purpose. We’re polling folks again to see how things have changed.

Please take a moment to fill out the survey by clicking this link >>

I’ll post the new white paper, Alumni Networks and Twitter –An Update, on this blog in February.

Thanks Twitter, Facebook: How I Got News about the Eureka Earthquake

I’m from Eureka, a relatively rural town of about 30,000 people in Northern California. For those of you unfamiliar with the foggy, green, quiet town where I was born and raised, here’s a map.

Saturday afternoon, Eureka was hit with a 6.5 earthquake. The majority of my extended family still lives in Eureka, and I was very concerned. Not only about the potential for earthquake damage, but about the potential for a tsunami (there was one up there in the 60s, and it killed 11 people). My sister and I weren’t able to reach our Mom and Dad right away; cell signals were dead and land lines were unreliable.

So how did I get details about what happened and how the town fared? From the Internet, of course.

But not from online newspapers. No, I got my info from my Facebook network and from Twitter:

Mind you, these posts are from Facebook friends who don’t even live in Eureka any longer, but they had spoken to their respective families. This at least reassured me that Eureka wasn’t underwater, or complete rubble.

Twitter gave me some other pieces to the puzzle as well, thanks to the #Eureka hashtag (search it now for ongoing info). Even Mashable was running a story that featured user @amyeureka‘s Twitter photos of the aftermath.

Thanks to all of these, I was able to at least get some idea of the current status: no reported deaths, no tsunamis, no obliterated buildings. Just a lot of broken glass, toppled bookcases and broken chimneys. I could make a somewhat reasonable assumption that at least my family was alive, though maybe missing a few picture frames and glassware. And I wouldn’t have obtained that information from broadcast news or the paper.

The good news? I was finally able to make contact with my family: thankfully, the only casualty at Mom and Dad’s was a television.

My Recent Experience with the Backchannel

The backchannel.

If you’re unfamiliar with the term, it’s a way of communicating digitally in real time during the delivery of live, spoken remarks. In modern parlance, the backchannel is the audience using Twitter and hashtags to converse about a particular presenter while the person (or persons) is speaking.

This practice isn’t new; Twitter just facilitates it. But it became big news a few weeks ago at the Higher Ed Web conference. The keynote speaker did not know his audience, was not well received, and the audience made their opinions known via Twitter. The backchannel was blazing with comments ranging from the quality of the slides to the relevance of the material covered to the general ineptitude of the speaker.

All of this was fresh in my mind as I made my way to Missouri to deliver a talk. I had read Jeremiah Owyang’s post on this issue, and I put some thought into how I might acknowledge the online conversation without short-changing the people who came to interact with me face-to-face. Jeremiah suggests monitoring the backchannel during your talk, dividing your focus between the feedback in the room and the feedback from the Twitterverse. I was afraid of short changing both audiences by trying to be in two places at once.

So I made a decision: give “first dibs” on my attention to the people who were sitting in the room. I reminded the audience of the hashtag for the conference (#musms09) and specifically acknowledged the backchannel conversation that I knew was inevitable. But I made it clear that I was there to interact with the audience directly at that point in time; I would go back and refer to the backchannel when the talk had ended.

In this particular case, I feel that my approach was effective. I didn’t have to divide my attention between reading the physical audience and the pixelated audience. If I had it to do again, I would probably assign a colleague or trusted audience member to monitor the backchannel on my behalf during my presentation (Jeremiah suggests this in his post above). Then, at the end of the talk, I would address “questions from the backchannel” brought to my attention by my colleague. Michael Stoner stepped into this role during my talk in Missouri even though we had not arranged it ahead of time (thank you Michael!).

I’d like to hear your thoughts and suggestions on engaging the backchannel; you may have experience as a speaker or an audience member – post a comment below with your experience or insight.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.